দাবিত্যাগ: এটি আইনি পরামর্শ নয়। আইন ও মামলা আইন পরিবর্তন হয়। আপনার নির্দিষ্ট পরিস্থিতির জন্য সর্বদা একজন যোগ্য আইনজীবীর সাথে পরামর্শ করুন।

সব মামলা
Company Law
Court of Appeal
1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Ch 935

Ratio Decidendi

The corporate veil will be pierced where a company is used as a device or stratagem to evade an existing legal obligation, such as a restrictive covenant.

তথ্য

Horne was a former managing director of Gilford Motor, bound by a non-solicitation covenant. He incorporated a company and used it to solicit Gilford's customers, circumventing the covenant.

রায়ের সারসংক্ষেপ

The Court of Appeal pierced the corporate veil. The company was formed as a device to mask Horne's activities and evade his contractual obligations. An injunction was granted against both Horne and the company.

মূল উদ্ধৃতি

"The company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business of Mr E.B. Horne."

Lord Hanworth MR

পরবর্তী ব্যবহার

Good law

Classic example of veil-piercing for evasion. Approved in Prest v Petrodel [2013] as an illustration of the evasion principle.