দাবিত্যাগ: এটি আইনি পরামর্শ নয়। আইন ও মামলা আইন পরিবর্তন হয়। আপনার নির্দিষ্ট পরিস্থিতির জন্য সর্বদা একজন যোগ্য আইনজীবীর সাথে পরামর্শ করুন।

সব মামলা
Human Rights
House of Lords
2001

R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2001] UKHL 26

Ratio Decidendi

Proportionality is a more structured and rigorous test than Wednesbury unreasonableness. Where Convention rights are at stake, the court must conduct a proportionality analysis rather than simply asking whether the decision was irrational.

তথ্য

A prison policy required prisoners to be absent from their cells during searches, during which legally privileged correspondence could be examined.

রায়ের সারসংক্ষেপ

The House of Lords held the blanket policy was unlawful as a disproportionate interference with the right to legal professional privilege. Lord Steyn explained the difference between Wednesbury and proportionality review.

মূল উদ্ধৃতি

"The intensity of review is somewhat greater under the proportionality approach... the proportionality test may go further than the traditional grounds of review."

Lord Steyn

পরবর্তী ব্যবহার

Good law

Key authority on the distinction between Wednesbury and proportionality review.