দাবিত্যাগ: এটি আইনি পরামর্শ নয়। আইন ও মামলা আইন পরিবর্তন হয়। আপনার নির্দিষ্ট পরিস্থিতির জন্য সর্বদা একজন যোগ্য আইনজীবীর সাথে পরামর্শ করুন।

সব মামলা
Counter-Terrorism Law
Supreme Court
2013

R v Gul

[2013] UKSC 64

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of terrorism in s.1 Terrorism Act 2000 is broad and includes action taken against the military forces of a state, even where the state is oppressive. The breadth of the definition is a matter for Parliament.

তথ্য

Gul uploaded videos glorifying attacks on coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was convicted of dissemination of terrorist publications under s.2 Terrorism Act 2006.

রায়ের সারসংক্ষেপ

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, holding that the s.1 definition of terrorism is deliberately broad and includes armed attacks on military forces where the other conditions of the definition are met.

মূল উদ্ধৃতি

"The definition in section 1 is very broad and, on its natural meaning, it includes military attacks by non-state armed groups."

Lord Neuberger

পরবর্তী ব্যবহার

Applied

Applied in subsequent cases on the scope of the terrorism definition.