দাবিত্যাগ: এটি আইনি পরামর্শ নয়। আইন ও মামলা আইন পরিবর্তন হয়। আপনার নির্দিষ্ট পরিস্থিতির জন্য সর্বদা একজন যোগ্য আইনজীবীর সাথে পরামর্শ করুন।

সব মামলা
Sentencing
Court of Appeal
2001

R v Offen

[2001] 1 WLR 253

Ratio Decidendi

The automatic life sentence provisions under s 2 Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 should be read compatibly with Article 5 ECHR. A life sentence is not required where the offender does not pose a significant risk to the public, even where the statutory criteria are met.

তথ্য

Several appeals were heard together concerning the mandatory life sentence for a second serious offence under s 2 of the 1997 Act.

রায়ের সারসংক্ষেপ

Lord Woolf CJ held the provision should be interpreted using s 3 HRA 1998 to require a significant risk assessment. An automatic life sentence was arbitrary and disproportionate where the offender posed no significant risk.

মূল উদ্ধৃতি

"If the offender is a significant risk to the public, a life sentence is justified. If he is not, a life sentence is arbitrary and disproportionate."

Lord Woolf CJ

পরবর্তী ব্যবহার

Good law

Key example of reading down a statute under s 3 HRA 1998 to achieve Convention compatibility.