면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Procurement Law
High Court (Chancery Division)
2010

Alstom Transport v Eurostar International Ltd

[2010] EWHC 2747 (Ch)

판결 이유

A claim for a declaration of ineffectiveness must be brought promptly. The court will consider the importance of the contract to the contracting authority and third parties when deciding whether to grant such relief.

사실관계

Alstom challenged the award of a contract for new Eurostar trains to Siemens. Alstom had also tendered and alleged the procurement was unlawful. It sought a declaration of ineffectiveness, which would cancel the contract.

판결 요약

The court held that even if there had been breaches, it would not be appropriate to declare the contract ineffective given its importance to cross-Channel rail services and the legitimate interests of passengers. Damages were the appropriate remedy.

주요 인용문

"The remedy of ineffectiveness is not automatic. The court must consider the public interest and the impact on those who would be affected."

Vos J

후속 처리

Followed

Important on the exercise of discretion in ineffectiveness claims.

Related Content