면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Human Rights
Supreme Court
2014

P v Cheshire West and Chester Council; P and Q v Surrey County Council

[2014] UKSC 19

판결 이유

A person is deprived of liberty for the purposes of Article 5 ECHR if they are under continuous supervision and control and are not free to leave, regardless of the purpose of the placement, the relative normality of the living arrangements, or whether the person is compliant or lacks capacity to object.

사실관계

Three individuals who lacked capacity were placed in care arrangements. The question was whether their living arrangements constituted a deprivation of liberty requiring authorisation.

판결 요약

The Supreme Court held that the 'acid test' for deprivation of liberty is: (1) is the person subject to continuous supervision and control? and (2) is the person free to leave? The purpose and relative comfort of the placement are irrelevant.

주요 인용문

"A gilded cage is still a cage."

Lady Hale

후속 처리

Good law

The 'acid test' is the standard for deprivation of liberty in care settings; led to a massive increase in DoLS applications.