면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Contract Law
House of Lords
1915

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd

[1915] AC 847

판결 이유

Only a party to a contract can sue on it (privity of contract). A person who is not a party to a contract cannot enforce a promise made for their benefit, even if they are the intended beneficiary.

사실관계

Dunlop sold tyres to Dew & Co (a dealer) on terms that Dew would not sell below list price and would obtain a similar undertaking from retailers. Dew sold to Selfridge, who agreed not to sell below list price. Selfridge sold below list price and Dunlop sued.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held that Dunlop could not enforce the agreement between Dew and Selfridge. Dunlop was not a party to that contract and had provided no consideration to Selfridge. The doctrine of privity prevented the claim.

주요 인용문

"In the law of England certain principles are fundamental. One is that only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it."

Viscount Haldane LC

후속 처리

Good law (modified by statute)

The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 now allows third parties to enforce contractual terms in certain circumstances, modifying the strict privity rule.

Related Content