판결 이유
Compensation for distress caused by data protection breaches can be claimed without proof of pecuniary loss. The DPA 1998 must be interpreted consistently with the EU Data Protection Directive.
사실관계
Google used tracking cookies to collect browsing data from Safari users without their consent. The claimants sued for misuse of private information and breach of the Data Protection Act 1998.
판결 요약
The Court of Appeal held that compensation for distress under s.13 DPA 1998 did not require proof of financial loss. This aligned domestic law with the EU Directive.
주요 인용문
"Compensation for distress is not conditional upon proof of pecuniary loss."
— Lord Dyson MR
후속 처리
Applied
Applied in subsequent data protection claims including under UK GDPR.