판결 이유
A statement of the minimum price at which a party would sell is not an offer to sell — it is merely a supply of information. An offer requires a clear indication of willingness to be bound on stated terms.
사실관계
Harvey telegraphed Facey: 'Will you sell us Bumper Hall Pen? Telegraph lowest cash price.' Facey replied: 'Lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen £900.' Harvey telegraphed: 'We agree to buy Bumper Hall Pen for £900. Please send us your title deed.'
판결 요약
The Privy Council held that there was no contract between the parties. Analysing the three telegrams, it held that Harvey's first telegram asked two questions (whether Facey would sell, and the lowest price); Facey's reply answered only the second, stating the lowest price he would accept if he sold; and Harvey's third telegram, purporting to accept, was in truth itself the first offer. Facey's statement of his lowest price was merely a response to a request for information and did not amount to an offer to sell, because it contained no indication of any willingness to be bound to sell at that price to Harvey. As there had been no offer by Facey capable of acceptance, no contract came into existence, and Facey was under no obligation to sell Bumper Hall Pen. The case is a leading illustration of the distinction between a statement of price (a mere supply of information) and an offer capable of acceptance.
주요 인용문
"The mere statement of the lowest price at which the vendor would sell contains no implied contract to sell at that price to the persons making the inquiry."
— Lord Morris
후속 처리
Standard authority distinguishing statements of price from offers.
What To Do Next
Step-by-Step Guides
Know Your Rights
Get Professional Help