면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Tort Law
House of Lords
1997

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd

[1997] AC 655

판결 이유

Only a person with a proprietary interest in land can sue in private nuisance. Interference with television reception by a building is not actionable in nuisance.

사실관계

Residents near Canary Wharf Tower complained that the building interfered with their television reception. Some claimants were licensees without proprietary interests.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held that only those with proprietary interests could sue in private nuisance — mere occupiers or licensees could not. Furthermore, the erection of a building that blocks TV signals is analogous to blocking a view, which is not actionable.

주요 인용문

"An action in private nuisance will only lie at the suit of a person who has a right to the land affected."

Lord Goff

후속 처리

Good law

Leading authority on standing in private nuisance and the non-actionability of interference with TV signals.