면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Aviation & Transport Law
Court of Appeal
2014

Huzar v Jet2.com Ltd

[2014] EWCA Civ 791

판결 이유

A technical fault with an aircraft is not an 'extraordinary circumstance' within the meaning of EU Regulation 261/2004 that would exempt the airline from paying compensation for flight delays.

사실관계

A Jet2 flight was delayed by over 27 hours due to a technical problem with the aircraft. The airline refused compensation, claiming the technical fault was an 'extraordinary circumstance'.

판결 요약

The Court of Appeal held that a technical fault inherent in the normal operation of the aircraft is not extraordinary. Only events beyond the carrier's actual control (e.g., hidden manufacturing defect, sabotage) could qualify.

주요 인용문

"A technical problem is inherent in the normal exercise of the carrier's activity and does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance."

Elias LJ

후속 처리

Leading Authority

Key English authority on the meaning of 'extraordinary circumstances' under Regulation 261/2004.

Related Content

Related Legislation