면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Equity & Trusts
Supreme Court
2013

Pitt v Holt; Futter v Futter

[2013] UKSC 26

판결 이유

A voluntary disposition can be set aside for mistake only if the mistake is sufficiently grave. It is not enough that the claimant would not have entered the transaction but for the mistake; the mistake must make it unconscionable for the donee to retain the property.

사실관계

Two appeals were heard together. Both involved transactions by trustees that had unintended adverse tax consequences.

판결 요약

The Supreme Court reformulated the law of mistake in relation to voluntary dispositions. Lord Walker held that the test is whether the mistake was of so serious a character as to render it unjust for the donee to retain the property.

주요 인용문

"The true requirement is for there to be a causative mistake of sufficient gravity."

Lord Walker

후속 처리

Good law

The leading authority on setting aside voluntary dispositions for mistake.