면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Defamation & Privacy
Court of Appeal
2005

Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc

[2005] QB 946

판결 이유

A defamation action can be struck out as an abuse of process where the publication is so limited that no real or substantial tort has been committed (the 'Jameel abuse' principle). The game must be worth the candle.

사실관계

Mr Jameel sued over an online article published by Dow Jones. Evidence showed the article had been accessed only five times in England and Wales, three of which were by his own associates.

판결 요약

The Court of Appeal struck out the claim as an abuse of process. The extent of publication within the jurisdiction was so small that no real or substantial tort had been committed. Continuing the proceedings would be disproportionate.

주요 인용문

"If the claimant has suffered no real or substantial tort, the game is not worth the candle."

Lord Phillips MR

후속 처리

Applied

Widely applied as the 'Jameel abuse' doctrine. Now supplemented by the s.1 Defamation Act 2013 serious harm requirement per Lachaux.