면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Family Law
House of Lords
2006

Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane

[2006] UKHL 24

판결 이유

The three principles governing ancillary relief on divorce are: needs, compensation (for relationship-generated disadvantage), and sharing (of the fruits of the matrimonial partnership). Non-matrimonial property may be treated differently from matrimonial property.

사실관계

Two appeals were heard together. Miller involved a short childless marriage to a wealthy man. McFarlane involved a long marriage where the wife gave up a lucrative career to raise children.

판결 요약

The House of Lords identified three strands justifying financial awards: needs, compensation for relationship-generated disadvantage, and equal sharing of matrimonial assets. In Miller, the short marriage limited the sharing claim. In McFarlane, the wife's career sacrifice justified a substantial award.

주요 인용문

"The rationale of the sharing principle is that marriage is a partnership of equals... when the partnership ends, each is entitled to an equal share of the assets of the partnership."

Lord Nicholls

후속 처리

Good law

The three-strand approach (needs, compensation, sharing) is now the standard framework for ancillary relief.