SponsoredBuild your website with Vincony

면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

UK Law Reference
모든 판례
Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
1998

Osman v United Kingdom

(1998) 29 EHRR 245

판결 이유

The state has a positive obligation under Article 2 (right to life) to take preventive operational measures to protect an individual whose life is at risk from the criminal acts of another, where the authorities knew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life and failed to take reasonable measures.

사실관계

A teacher, Paul Paget-Lewis, developed an obsession with a pupil, Ahmet Osman. Despite a series of escalating incidents and police involvement, no effective action was taken. Paget-Lewis killed Ahmet's father and seriously injured Ahmet.

판결 요약

The European Court of Human Rights held that Article 2 (the right to life) may impose a positive obligation on the state to take preventive operational measures to protect an identified individual whose life is at risk from the criminal acts of another, but that this obligation must be interpreted so as not to impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities. On the facts, the Court found it had not been established that at the decisive time the police knew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to the lives of the Osman family from Paget-Lewis, so there was no breach of the operational duty. The Court did, however, find a violation of Article 6(1): striking out the negligence claim against the police on grounds of the public-policy immunity in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire amounted to a disproportionate restriction on the applicants' right of access to a court. The judgment established the 'Osman test' for the Article 2 operational duty; its Article 6 reasoning was later reconsidered and effectively qualified in Z v United Kingdom.

주요 인용문

"It must be established that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk to the life of an identified individual from the criminal acts of a third party and that they failed to take measures within the scope of their powers which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk."

The Court

후속 처리

Good law

Foundational ECHR authority on the positive obligation to protect life. The 'Osman test' is applied in all Article 2 operational duty cases.