면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Evidence
House of Lords
1987

R v Andrews

[1987] AC 281

판결 이유

A statement made by a person so shortly after an event and in circumstances so closely associated with it that the mind was still dominated by the event is admissible as a res gestae statement, provided there was no possibility of concoction or distortion.

사실관계

The victim of a stabbing told police officers who arrived at the scene the name of his attacker. He later died.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held the statement was admissible as part of the res gestae. Lord Ackner set out the test: the statement must be so closely associated with the event that the possibility of concoction or distortion could be disregarded.

주요 인용문

"The primary question which the judge must ask is: can the possibility of concoction or distortion be disregarded?"

Lord Ackner

후속 처리

Good law

Leading authority on res gestae, now also relevant to the hearsay exceptions in the Criminal Justice Act 2003.