면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Drug Regulation Law
Court of Appeal
1971

R v Marriott

[1971] 1 WLR 187

판결 이유

Possession of a controlled drug requires proof that the defendant had a substance in their possession and knew it was a controlled drug, or was wilfully blind to that fact.

사실관계

The defendant was found with traces of cannabis on a penknife. He argued he did not know the substance was cannabis.

판결 요약

The Court of Appeal held that possession requires knowledge that the substance is a controlled drug. Mere possession of a container is not sufficient without knowledge of its contents being a controlled drug.

주요 인용문

"A person has possession if he knows that the thing he possesses is a controlled drug."

Lord Widgery CJ

후속 처리

Applied

Applied in subsequent drug possession cases.