면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Criminal Law
Court of Appeal
1983

R v Pagett

(1983) 76 Cr App R 279

판결 이유

The reasonable act of a third party acting in self-defence or in the execution of duty does not break the chain of causation. The defendant who creates the dangerous situation remains the legal cause of the victim's death.

사실관계

Pagett held his pregnant girlfriend as a shield while firing at armed police officers. The police returned fire, killing the girl. Pagett was charged with her manslaughter.

판결 요약

The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction. The police officers' instinctive return of fire was a reasonable and foreseeable response to Pagett's actions. It did not break the chain of causation. Pagett's act of using her as a shield was both the factual and legal cause of her death.

주요 인용문

"The reasonable act of a third party, such as a police officer acting in self-defence, does not break the causal chain between the defendant's act and the victim's death."

Robert Goff LJ

후속 처리

Good law

Standard authority on third-party acts and the chain of causation in criminal law.