면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Evidence
Court of Appeal
1977

R v Turnbull

[1977] QB 224

판결 이유

Where the prosecution case depends wholly or substantially on identification evidence, the judge must warn the jury of the special need for caution and direct them to examine the circumstances of the identification using the Turnbull guidelines.

사실관계

Several appeals were heard together, all involving convictions based on visual identification evidence.

판결 요약

Lord Widgery CJ laid down guidelines for identification evidence. The jury must consider: the amount of time the witness observed the accused, the distance, lighting, whether the witness knew the accused, the time lapse between observation and identification, and any discrepancies.

주요 인용문

"The judge should direct the jury to examine closely the circumstances in which the identification by each witness came to be made."

Lord Widgery CJ

후속 처리

Good law

The Turnbull guidelines remain the standard direction for identification evidence.