면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Childcare & Safeguarding
House of Lords
2008

Re B (Children)

[2008] UKHL 35

판결 이유

In care proceedings, the standard of proof is the ordinary civil standard — the balance of probabilities. There is no heightened standard for serious allegations. Neither the seriousness of the allegation nor its consequences should affect the standard of proof.

사실관계

A local authority sought care orders alleging sexual abuse. The trial judge applied an enhanced standard of proof given the seriousness of the allegations.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held that the standard of proof in care proceedings is always the balance of probabilities, regardless of the seriousness of the allegations. The previous approach of a 'heightened standard' for serious cases was wrong.

주요 인용문

"The standard of proof in finding the facts necessary to establish the threshold under section 31(2) is the simple balance of probabilities."

Baroness Hale

후속 처리

Leading Authority

Definitive authority on standard of proof in care proceedings.