면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Defamation & Privacy
House of Lords
2001

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd

[2001] 2 AC 127

판결 이유

Responsible journalism on matters of public interest could provide a defence to defamation (the Reynolds privilege). A non-exhaustive list of factors ('the Reynolds factors') were relevant to whether the defence was made out.

사실관계

Albert Reynolds, the former Irish Taoiseach, sued The Sunday Times over an article about his resignation. The newspaper argued it was protected by qualified privilege as responsible journalism on a matter of public interest.

판결 요약

The House of Lords developed a new form of qualified privilege for responsible journalism on matters of public interest. Lord Nicholls set out ten non-exhaustive factors for assessing whether the defence applied, including the seriousness of the allegation, steps taken to verify, and whether comment was sought from the claimant.

주요 인용문

"The court should have particular regard to the importance of freedom of expression. The press discharges vital functions as a bloodhound as well as a watchdog."

Lord Nicholls

후속 처리

Superseded

Replaced by the statutory public interest defence in s.4 Defamation Act 2013, though the Reynolds factors remain relevant to applying s.4.