면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Tort
House of Lords
1995

Spring v Guardian Assurance plc

[1995] 2 AC 296

판결 이유

An employer owes a duty of care to an employee or former employee when providing a reference. A negligently prepared reference causing economic loss to the subject is actionable in negligence.

사실관계

Mr Spring was dismissed and his former employer provided a reference to a prospective employer that was negligently inaccurate and highly damaging. He was unable to obtain new employment.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held the employer owed a duty of care in preparing the reference. The relationship was sufficiently proximate and it was fair, just, and reasonable to impose liability for a carelessly prepared reference.

주요 인용문

"It would be wrong to deny the existence of a duty of care when the consequences of doing so would be to leave a victim of negligence without a remedy."

Lord Goff

후속 처리

Good law

Leading authority on employer's duty of care in providing references.