면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Property Law
Court of Chancery
1848

Tulk v Moxhay

(1848) 2 Ph 774

판결 이유

A restrictive covenant (negative obligation) attached to land can be enforced against subsequent purchasers who take the land with notice of the covenant, in equity.

사실관계

Tulk sold a garden in Leicester Square to Elms, who covenanted to maintain it as a garden. The land passed through several hands until it was purchased by Moxhay, who intended to build on it. Moxhay had notice of the covenant.

판결 요약

Lord Cottenham LC held that equity would enforce the restrictive covenant against Moxhay because he had taken the land with notice of it. It would be inequitable to allow him to disregard the covenant.

주요 인용문

"If an equity is attached to the property by the owner, no one purchasing with notice of that equity can stand in a different situation from the party from whom he purchased."

Lord Cottenham LC

후속 처리

Good law

Foundation of the law of restrictive covenants in land law. The rules have been developed by subsequent cases and now require registration under the Land Registration Act 2002.