SponsoredBuild your website with Vincony

면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

UK Law Reference
모든 법률
Tort Law
c. 43

Consumer Protection Act 1987

legislation.gov.uk에서 보기

요약

The Consumer Protection Act 1987 implemented the EU Product Liability Directive into English law. Part I establishes strict liability for damage caused by defective products — claimants need not prove negligence, only that the product was defective and caused the damage. Part II creates criminal offences for supplying unsafe consumer goods. Part III deals with misleading price indications.

핵심 포인트

  • Strict liability — producer liable for damage caused by a defect in their product without proof of fault (s.2)
  • Product is defective if its safety is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect (s.3)
  • Producer includes manufacturer, importer into UK, and own-brander (s.2(2))
  • Damage means death, personal injury, or damage to property (over £275) intended for private use (s.5)
  • Development risks defence — producer not liable if state of scientific/technical knowledge at the time was not such that they could have been expected to discover the defect (s.4(1)(e))
  • Part II — general safety requirement: criminal offence to supply consumer goods that are not reasonably safe
  • Limitation period — 3 years from awareness of damage; long-stop 10 years from supply (s.11A Limitation Act 1980)
  • Strict liability for defective products — no need to prove negligence (s.2)
  • 'Defect' means safety is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect (s.3)
  • Liability falls on producers, importers, and own-branders (s.2(2))
  • Development risks defence — state of scientific knowledge (s.4(1)(e))
  • Criminal offence to supply unsafe consumer goods (Part II)
  • Misleading price indications prohibited (Part III)
  • 10-year longstop from when product was supplied (Limitation Act 1980, s.11A)

편과 조

개정 이력

2000Consumer Protection Act 1987 (Product Liability) (Modification) Order 2000

Amended the development risks defence following ECJ ruling in Commission v UK (C-300/95).

Related Content