국제사법
관할권, 준거법 및 외국 판결의 승인.
소개
Conflict of laws (private international law) determines which country's courts have jurisdiction to hear a dispute, which country's law applies to the substance of the dispute, and whether foreign judgments will be recognised and enforced. Post-Brexit, the UK no longer participates in the EU Brussels/Lugano regime. Jurisdiction is now governed primarily by common law rules and retained EU law. The Rome I and Rome II Regulations (retained) continue to determine applicable law in contractual and non-contractual matters.
핵심 원칙
Jurisdiction — Post-Brexit, English courts determine jurisdiction under common law (service of proceedings, submission, forum non conveniens) and retained EU law for matters not covered by international conventions.
Applicable Law in Contract — The Rome I Regulation (retained) determines the law applicable to contractual obligations. The parties' choice of law is generally respected. In the absence of choice, the law of the country most closely connected applies.
Applicable Law in Tort — The Rome II Regulation (retained) determines the law applicable to non-contractual obligations. The general rule is the law of the country where the damage occurs (lex loci damni).
Recognition of Foreign Judgments — Foreign judgments may be recognised and enforced under common law (requiring a final and conclusive judgment of a court with jurisdiction), bilateral treaties, or the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005.
Forum Non Conveniens — English courts may stay proceedings if another forum is clearly more appropriate for the trial of the action (Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex [1987]).
핵심 법령
Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Act 2020
주요 판례
Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex
[1987] AC 460
Owusu v Jackson
[2005] ECR I-1383
일반적인 시나리오
Cross-border contract dispute post-Brexit
Determine jurisdiction under common law rules (service, submission) or residual retained EU law. The applicable law is determined by the Rome I Regulation (retained): the parties' choice of law prevails; otherwise, the law most closely connected to the contract applies.