ਬੇਦਾਅਵਾ: ਇਹ ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ। ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਅਤੇ ਕੇਸ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਬਦਲਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾ ਆਪਣੀ ਖਾਸ ਸਥਿਤੀ ਲਈ ਯੋਗ ਵਕੀਲ ਨਾਲ ਸਲਾਹ ਕਰੋ।

ਸਾਰੇ ਕੇਸ
Ecclesiastical Law
House of Lords
2003

Aston Cantlow PCC v Wallbank

[2003] UKHL 37

Ratio Decidendi

A parochial church council is not a 'public authority' within the meaning of section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 when enforcing chancel repair liability, because it is not exercising functions of a public nature in doing so.

ਤੱਥ

The Wallbanks owned land that was subject to chancel repair liability — an ancient obligation to contribute to the repair of the parish church. The PCC sued to enforce the liability. The Wallbanks argued the PCC was acting as a public authority and the liability violated their Convention rights.

ਫੈਸਲੇ ਦਾ ਸਾਰ

The House of Lords held that the PCC was not a public authority for HRA purposes when enforcing chancel repair liability. The enforcement of a property right (chancel repair liability) was not the exercise of a function of a governmental nature. The PCC was acting as a private landowner enforcing a private law right.

ਮੁੱਖ ਹਵਾਲੇ

"The act of enforcing a private property right cannot be characterised as the exercise of a function of a public nature merely because the right-holder is an ecclesiastical body."

Lord Nicholls

ਬਾਅਦ ਦਾ ਇਲਾਜ

Followed

Important authority on the meaning of 'public authority' under the HRA.

Legislated

Led to amendments requiring chancel repair liability to be registered under the Land Registration Act 2002.

Related Content