ਬੇਦਾਅਵਾ: ਇਹ ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ। ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਅਤੇ ਕੇਸ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਬਦਲਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾ ਆਪਣੀ ਖਾਸ ਸਥਿਤੀ ਲਈ ਯੋਗ ਵਕੀਲ ਨਾਲ ਸਲਾਹ ਕਰੋ।

ਸਾਰੇ ਕੇਸ
Energy Law
Supreme Court
2016

NATS v Heathrow Airport Ltd

[2016] UKSC 39

Ratio Decidendi

Contractual risk allocation provisions will be interpreted according to their natural meaning. A party may be entitled to recover charges even where the underlying cause of the expenditure lies elsewhere in the supply chain.

ਤੱਥ

A dispute arose about charges between NATS (air traffic control) and Heathrow Airport. The underlying issue concerned how costs were allocated following major infrastructure works.

ਫੈਸਲੇ ਦਾ ਸਾਰ

The Supreme Court interpreted the contractual provisions according to their ordinary meaning. The case illustrates the importance of clear drafting in infrastructure and energy supply contracts.

ਮੁੱਖ ਹਵਾਲੇ

"The contract is clear and must be given effect according to its terms."

Lord Sumption

ਬਾਅਦ ਦਾ ਇਲਾਜ

Applied

Cited in energy supply and infrastructure contract disputes.

Related Content

Related Legislation