SponsoredBuild your website with Vincony

ਬੇਦਾਅਵਾ: ਇਹ ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ। ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਅਤੇ ਕੇਸ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਬਦਲਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾ ਆਪਣੀ ਖਾਸ ਸਥਿਤੀ ਲਈ ਯੋਗ ਵਕੀਲ ਨਾਲ ਸਲਾਹ ਕਰੋ।

UK Law Reference
ਸਾਰੇ ਕੇਸ
Sentencing
Court of Appeal
2001

R v Offen

[2001] 1 WLR 253

Ratio Decidendi

The automatic life sentence provisions under s 2 Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 should be read compatibly with Article 5 ECHR. A life sentence is not required where the offender does not pose a significant risk to the public, even where the statutory criteria are met.

ਤੱਥ

Several appeals were heard together concerning the mandatory life sentence for a second serious offence under s 2 of the 1997 Act.

ਫੈਸਲੇ ਦਾ ਸਾਰ

Lord Woolf CJ held the provision should be interpreted using s 3 HRA 1998 to require a significant risk assessment. An automatic life sentence was arbitrary and disproportionate where the offender posed no significant risk.

ਮੁੱਖ ਹਵਾਲੇ

"If the offender is a significant risk to the public, a life sentence is justified. If he is not, a life sentence is arbitrary and disproportionate."

Lord Woolf CJ

ਬਾਅਦ ਦਾ ਇਲਾਜ

Good law

Key example of reading down a statute under s 3 HRA 1998 to achieve Convention compatibility.