Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd
[1980] AC 827
Ratio Decidendi
An exclusion clause can be effective even in cases of fundamental breach, provided it is clear enough to cover the breach in question. The doctrine of fundamental breach as a rule of law was rejected.
Fakty
Securicor provided a night patrol service for Photo Production's factory. One of Securicor's employees deliberately started a fire that destroyed the factory. Securicor relied on an exclusion clause limiting liability.
Podsumowanie orzeczenia
The House of Lords held that the exclusion clause was effective. Lord Wilberforce rejected the 'rule of law' approach to fundamental breach, holding that whether an exclusion clause covers a particular breach is a matter of construction of the contract.
Kluczowe cytaty
"It is not correct to say that an exclusion clause can never apply to a fundamental breach. The question is always one of construction."
— Lord Wilberforce
Późniejsze zastosowanie
Established that exclusion clauses are to be construed according to their terms, not struck down by a rule of law.