SponsoredBuild your website with Vincony

Zastrzeżenie: To nie jest porada prawna. Ustawodawstwo i orzecznictwo ulegają zmianom. Zawsze skonsultuj się z wykwalifikowanym prawnikiem w swojej konkretnej sytuacji.

UK Law Reference
← All Comparisons
Civil Procedure
Updated 2026-04-09

Small Claims Track vs Fast Track

Understanding the difference between the County Court small claims track and fast track, and which is appropriate for your civil claim.

Overview

When a civil claim is defended in the County Court, it is allocated to one of three tracks: the small claims track (claims up to £10,000), the fast track (£10,000–£25,000), or the multi-track (above £25,000 or complex cases). Track allocation determines the procedural rules, the hearing format, and — critically — the costs rules. The fast track imposes fixed costs from April 2023 (Civil Procedure Rules r.45.29A onwards).

Side-by-Side Comparison

Small Claims Track

Cost: Issue fee (£35–£455 depending on value); hearing fee included
Time: 3–6 months to hearing

Pros

  • Very limited costs exposure — even if you lose, you generally pay no more than court fees and fixed witness expenses
  • Informal hearings before a District Judge — no legal formality required
  • Fixed hearing fee included in the issue fee for claims under £10,000
  • Free HMCTS Small Claims Mediation Service available

Cons

  • Even if you win, you cannot recover legal fees — so instructing a solicitor is usually uneconomic
  • Limited to £10,000 (£1,000 for personal injury) unless agreed otherwise
  • Expert evidence is tightly controlled (cap of £750 per report, court permission required)
  • Enforcement is your own responsibility after judgment

Best For

Consumer disputes, unpaid invoices, minor contract disputes, faulty goods and services claims — where the value is under £10,000 and the facts are straightforward.

Fast Track

Cost: Issue fee proportionate to claim value; hearing fee separate; fixed recoverable costs on judgment
Time: 6–12 months to hearing

Pros

  • More structured process with exchange of witness statements and expert reports
  • If you win, you can recover fixed costs from the losing party (April 2023 fixed costs regime)
  • Suitable for moderately complex disputes requiring proper case management
  • Expert evidence in two disciplines is permitted

Cons

  • Higher court fees than small claims track
  • More procedurally demanding — failure to comply with directions can lead to sanctions
  • Even with fixed costs recovery, solicitor fees can significantly exceed what you recover
  • Hearing listed for a set period (usually one day) — more pressure to prepare thoroughly

Best For

Personal injury claims, professional negligence claims, and commercial disputes in the £10,000–£25,000 range where the facts are reasonably well defined.

Key Differences

AspectSmall Claims TrackFast Track
Claim valueUp to £10,000 (£1,000 PI)£10,001–£25,000
Costs recoveryNo costs recovery (except court fee and limited disbursements)Fixed recoverable costs if you win
Expert evidenceTightly restricted; £750 cap per report; permission requiredUp to two experts; SJE (single joint expert) usual
FormalityInformal — strict rules of evidence relaxedFormal — CPR rules apply; directions strictly enforced
Hearing durationUsually 1–2 hoursUsually a full day (listed time allocated)
Costs riskMinimal — limited costs exposure even if you loseSignificant — you could be ordered to pay the other side's fixed costs

Our Recommendation

If your claim value is under £10,000, the small claims track is almost always preferable — the informal process, free mediation service, and minimal costs exposure make it accessible. For claims above £10,000, the fast track is unavoidable for defended cases, but the fixed costs regime (from October 2023) makes recovery more predictable. Consider instructing a solicitor for fast track cases where the costs of representation are likely to be recoverable.

Related Guides