Avertisment: Acesta nu este un sfat juridic. Legislația și jurisprudența se schimbă. Consultați întotdeauna un avocat calificat pentru situația dvs. specifică.

Toate cazurile
Financial Services
Supreme Court
2021

FCA v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd

[2021] UKSC 1

Ratio Decidendi

Business interruption insurance policies that cover losses arising from notifiable diseases or government-mandated closures may cover losses caused by COVID-19, depending on the policy wording. The 'but for' test of causation is not appropriate for disease clause policies.

Fapte

The FCA brought a test case on behalf of policyholders to determine whether various types of business interruption insurance policies covered losses from COVID-19 and associated lockdowns.

Rezumatul hotărârii

The Supreme Court largely upheld the FCA's arguments, finding that many policy wordings did cover COVID-19 losses. Disease clauses did not require the policyholder to show that the particular case of disease in the relevant area was the proximate cause of the business interruption.

Citate cheie

"Each case of COVID-19 that had occurred by the date of any government measure was a separate and equally effective cause of that measure."

Lord Hamblen and Lord Leggatt

Tratament ulterior

Leading Authority

The definitive case on COVID-19 business interruption insurance in the UK.