Avertisment: Acesta nu este un sfat juridic. Legislația și jurisprudența se schimbă. Consultați întotdeauna un avocat calificat pentru situația dvs. specifică.

Toate cazurile
Company Law
Court of Appeal
1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Ch 935

Ratio Decidendi

The corporate veil will be pierced where a company is used as a device or stratagem to evade an existing legal obligation, such as a restrictive covenant.

Fapte

Horne was a former managing director of Gilford Motor, bound by a non-solicitation covenant. He incorporated a company and used it to solicit Gilford's customers, circumventing the covenant.

Rezumatul hotărârii

The Court of Appeal pierced the corporate veil. The company was formed as a device to mask Horne's activities and evade his contractual obligations. An injunction was granted against both Horne and the company.

Citate cheie

"The company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business of Mr E.B. Horne."

Lord Hanworth MR

Tratament ulterior

Good law

Classic example of veil-piercing for evasion. Approved in Prest v Petrodel [2013] as an illustration of the evasion principle.