SponsoredBuild your website with Vincony

Avertisment: Acesta nu este un sfat juridic. Legislația și jurisprudența se schimbă. Consultați întotdeauna un avocat calificat pentru situația dvs. specifică.

UK Law Reference
Toate cazurile
Family Law
House of Lords
2006

Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane

[2006] UKHL 24

Ratio Decidendi

The three principles governing ancillary relief on divorce are: needs, compensation (for relationship-generated disadvantage), and sharing (of the fruits of the matrimonial partnership). Non-matrimonial property may be treated differently from matrimonial property.

Fapte

Two appeals were heard together. In Miller, a wealthy fund manager left his wife after a short, childless marriage of under three years; during the marriage his fortune had grown very substantially, and the wife sought a share of that increase. In McFarlane, a long marriage had ended in which the wife, a former successful City solicitor, had by agreement given up a highly paid career to raise the couple's three children while the husband's own earnings grew to a very high level; the available capital was modest but the husband's income was large, raising the question of ongoing periodical payments to reflect her relationship-generated disadvantage.

Rezumatul hotărârii

The House of Lords identified three strands justifying financial awards: needs, compensation for relationship-generated disadvantage, and equal sharing of matrimonial assets. In Miller, the short marriage limited the sharing claim. In McFarlane, the wife's career sacrifice justified a substantial award.

Citate cheie

"The rationale of the sharing principle is that marriage is a partnership of equals... when the partnership ends, each is entitled to an equal share of the assets of the partnership."

Lord Nicholls

Tratament ulterior

Good law

The three-strand approach (needs, compensation, sharing) is now the standard framework for ancillary relief.