Avertisment: Acesta nu este un sfat juridic. Legislația și jurisprudența se schimbă. Consultați întotdeauna un avocat calificat pentru situația dvs. specifică.

Toate cazurile
Criminal Law
Court of Appeal
1971

R v Roberts

(1971) 56 Cr App R 95

Ratio Decidendi

Where a victim takes evasive action to escape the defendant's unlawful conduct, the defendant is liable for the resulting injuries provided the victim's reaction was within the range of reasonably foreseeable responses.

Fapte

Roberts made unwanted sexual advances to a woman in his car. She jumped from the moving car and was injured.

Rezumatul hotărârii

The conviction for ABH was upheld. The victim's act of jumping was a reasonably foreseeable reaction. Only a 'daft' or 'wholly unexpected' response would break the chain of causation.

Citate cheie

"The test is whether the victim's act was the natural result of what the assailant said and did, in the sense that it was something that could reasonably have been foreseen."

Stephenson LJ

Tratament ulterior

Good law

Key authority on victim response and causation. Applied in R v Williams and Davis [1992].