ข้อจำกัดความรับผิดชอบ: นี่ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย กฎหมายและคดีมีการเปลี่ยนแปลง โปรดปรึกษาทนายความที่มีคุณสมบัติสำหรับสถานการณ์เฉพาะของคุณ

คดีทั้งหมด
Administrative Law
House of Lords
1985

Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (GCHQ)

[1985] AC 374

Ratio Decidendi

The exercise of prerogative powers is in principle subject to judicial review. The three heads of judicial review are illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety.

ข้อเท็จจริง

The Minister for the Civil Service (the Prime Minister) issued an instruction banning trade union membership at GCHQ on national security grounds without prior consultation.

สรุปคำพิพากษา

The House of Lords held that prerogative powers are reviewable, but the ban was justified on national security grounds. Lord Diplock articulated the three grounds of judicial review: illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety.

คำกล่าวสำคัญ

"Judicial review has I think developed to a stage today when one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds upon which administrative action is subject to control by judicial review."

Lord Diplock

การอ้างอิงภายหลัง

Foundational

Lord Diplock's three heads remain the orthodox classification of grounds for judicial review.