ข้อจำกัดความรับผิดชอบ: นี่ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย กฎหมายและคดีมีการเปลี่ยนแปลง โปรดปรึกษาทนายความที่มีคุณสมบัติสำหรับสถานการณ์เฉพาะของคุณ

คดีทั้งหมด
Intellectual Property
House of Lords
2000

Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd

[2000] 1 WLR 2416

Ratio Decidendi

Copyright infringement requires proof that the defendant copied a substantial part of the claimant's work. Substantiality is assessed qualitatively, not merely quantitatively. The question is whether the copied features constitute an original intellectual creation.

ข้อเท็จจริง

The claimant designed a fabric featuring painted stripes and flowers. The defendant produced a fabric with a similar design. The claimant alleged copyright infringement.

สรุปคำพิพากษา

The House of Lords held there was copyright infringement. The similarities between the designs were sufficient to establish that a substantial part had been copied. Lord Millett emphasised the qualitative nature of the substantiality test.

คำกล่าวสำคัญ

"The question is one of degree and is best addressed by asking whether a substantial part of the skill, labour and judgment which went into the creation of the copyright work has been appropriated."

Lord Millett

การอ้างอิงภายหลัง

Good law

Leading authority on the qualitative approach to substantiality in copyright infringement.