ข้อจำกัดความรับผิดชอบ: นี่ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย กฎหมายและคดีมีการเปลี่ยนแปลง โปรดปรึกษาทนายความที่มีคุณสมบัติสำหรับสถานการณ์เฉพาะของคุณ

คดีทั้งหมด
Family Law
House of Lords
2006

Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane

[2006] UKHL 24

Ratio Decidendi

The three principles governing ancillary relief on divorce are: needs, compensation (for relationship-generated disadvantage), and sharing (of the fruits of the matrimonial partnership). Non-matrimonial property may be treated differently from matrimonial property.

ข้อเท็จจริง

Two appeals were heard together. Miller involved a short childless marriage to a wealthy man. McFarlane involved a long marriage where the wife gave up a lucrative career to raise children.

สรุปคำพิพากษา

The House of Lords identified three strands justifying financial awards: needs, compensation for relationship-generated disadvantage, and equal sharing of matrimonial assets. In Miller, the short marriage limited the sharing claim. In McFarlane, the wife's career sacrifice justified a substantial award.

คำกล่าวสำคัญ

"The rationale of the sharing principle is that marriage is a partnership of equals... when the partnership ends, each is entitled to an equal share of the assets of the partnership."

Lord Nicholls

การอ้างอิงภายหลัง

Good law

The three-strand approach (needs, compensation, sharing) is now the standard framework for ancillary relief.