ข้อจำกัดความรับผิดชอบ: นี่ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย กฎหมายและคดีมีการเปลี่ยนแปลง โปรดปรึกษาทนายความที่มีคุณสมบัติสำหรับสถานการณ์เฉพาะของคุณ

คดีทั้งหมด
Equity & Trusts
Court of Appeal
2002

Pennington v Waine

[2002] EWCA Civ 227

Ratio Decidendi

A gift of shares may be treated as complete in equity where it would be unconscionable for the donor to recall the gift, even if the donor has not done everything in their power to transfer legal title.

ข้อเท็จจริง

Ada Crampton wished to give shares to her nephew Harold. She signed a transfer form which was given to her agent but never delivered to the company or Harold.

สรุปคำพิพากษา

The Court of Appeal held the gift was effective. It would have been unconscionable for Ada to resile given her clear intention and Harold's reliance in becoming a director.

คำกล่าวสำคัญ

"There is a benevolent construction given to share transfers where the donor has clearly shown an intention to make a gift and it would be unconscionable to recall it."

Arden LJ

การอ้างอิงภายหลัง

Good law

Controversial extension of Re Rose; criticised by some academics but remains binding.