Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Competition Law
Court of Appeal
2006

Argos Ltd v Office of Fair Trading

[2006] EWCA Civ 1318

Ratio Decidendi

Price-fixing through indirect information exchange (hub and spoke) constitutes an anti-competitive agreement under the Competition Act 1998. A retailer who communicates pricing information through a common supplier participates in a concerted practice.

Facts

Argos and Littlewoods were found to have indirectly exchanged pricing information on toys and games through a common supplier, Hasbro.

Judgment Summary

The Court of Appeal upheld the Competition Appeal Tribunal's finding of price-fixing. The indirect exchange of future pricing intentions through a common supplier constituted a concerted practice.

Key Quotes

"The communication of future pricing intentions between competitors through a common supplier is capable of constituting a concerted practice."

Arden LJ

Subsequent Treatment

Applied

Applied in subsequent hub-and-spoke cartel cases.