Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Company Law
Court of Appeal
1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Ch 935

Ratio Decidendi

The corporate veil will be pierced where a company is used as a mere cloak or sham to evade an existing legal obligation such as a restrictive covenant.

Facts

Mr Horne, a former managing director of Gilford Motor, was bound by a non-solicitation covenant. He formed a company to solicit Gilford's customers, arguing the covenant bound him personally but not the company.

Judgment Summary

The Court of Appeal held the company was formed as a device to evade the covenant. The injunction was granted against both Mr Horne and his company.

Key Quotes

"The company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business by the defendant."

Lord Hanworth MR

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Classic example of veil-piercing for evasion, approved in Prest v Petrodel.