Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Criminal Law
Supreme Court
2016

R v Golds

[2016] UKSC 61

Ratio Decidendi

For the partial defence of diminished responsibility under s 52 Coroners and Justice Act 2009, 'substantial' impairment means an impairment that is more than merely trivial — it need not be total but it must be significant or appreciable.

Facts

The defendant killed his partner. He raised the partial defence of diminished responsibility, relying on a personality disorder.

Judgment Summary

The Supreme Court held that 'substantial' means something between trivial and total. In most cases, no direction is needed on the meaning of substantial, but where there is an issue, the judge should direct that it means more than merely trivial.

Key Quotes

"Substantial does not mean total, but it means more than merely trivial or minimal."

Lord Hughes

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

The leading authority on the meaning of 'substantial' in the diminished responsibility defence.