Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Tort Law
Court of Appeal
1879

Sturges v Bridgman

(1879) 11 Ch D 852

Ratio Decidendi

What amounts to a nuisance depends on the character of the locality. The standard is that of the reasonable user of land in that particular neighbourhood. A prescriptive right to commit a nuisance cannot be acquired until the activity actually becomes actionable.

Facts

A confectioner had used heavy mortars and pestles in his premises for over 20 years. A doctor built a consulting room at the end of his garden, adjacent to the confectioner's premises. The noise and vibration disturbed the doctor's practice. The confectioner argued he had acquired a prescriptive right through long use.

Judgment Summary

The Court of Appeal held in favour of the doctor. The nuisance only became actionable when the consulting room was built, so no prescriptive right had been acquired. The character of the neighbourhood was relevant to determining whether the interference was unreasonable.

Key Quotes

"What would be a nuisance in Belgrave Square would not necessarily be so in Bermondsey."

Thesiger LJ

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Classic authority on the locality principle in nuisance. Applied in Coventry v Lawrence [2014].