Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Property Law
Court of Appeal
1882

Walsh v Lonsdale

(1882) 21 Ch D 9

Ratio Decidendi

An agreement for a lease that is specifically enforceable is treated in equity as if the lease had already been granted. Equity looks on as done that which ought to be done.

Facts

Lonsdale agreed in writing to grant Walsh a seven-year lease of a mill, with rent payable in advance. No deed was executed. Walsh went into possession and paid rent quarterly in arrear. Lonsdale demanded a year's rent in advance as per the agreement and distrained for it.

Judgment Summary

The Court of Appeal held that the agreement was specifically enforceable and therefore in equity was as good as a formal lease. Lonsdale was entitled to demand rent in advance under the terms of the equitable lease.

Key Quotes

"There is an agreement for a lease of which specific performance would be granted. That being so, the tenant holds under the same terms in equity as if a lease had been granted."

Jessel MR

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Remains the leading authority on the principle that an agreement for a lease = an equitable lease. Subject to the requirement of a written contract under s.2 Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989.