Aviso legal: Esto no constituye asesoramiento jurídico. La legislación y la jurisprudencia cambian. Consulte siempre con un abogado cualificado para su situación específica.

Todos los casos
Administrative Law
House of Lords
1985

Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (GCHQ)

[1985] AC 374

Ratio Decidendi

The exercise of prerogative powers is in principle subject to judicial review. The three heads of judicial review are illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety.

Hechos

The Minister for the Civil Service (the Prime Minister) issued an instruction banning trade union membership at GCHQ on national security grounds without prior consultation.

Resumen de la sentencia

The House of Lords held that prerogative powers are reviewable, but the ban was justified on national security grounds. Lord Diplock articulated the three grounds of judicial review: illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety.

Citas clave

"Judicial review has I think developed to a stage today when one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds upon which administrative action is subject to control by judicial review."

Lord Diplock

Tratamiento posterior

Foundational

Lord Diplock's three heads remain the orthodox classification of grounds for judicial review.