Aviso legal: Esto no constituye asesoramiento jurídico. La legislación y la jurisprudencia cambian. Consulte siempre con un abogado cualificado para su situación específica.

Todos los casos
Election Law
High Court
2022

McDonald v Crofts

[2022] EWHC 1042 (QB)

Ratio Decidendi

Social media statements by a candidate may constitute false statements about the personal character of another candidate under the Representation of the People Act 1983 if they are factual assertions rather than expressions of opinion.

Hechos

Following a local council election, the unsuccessful candidate alleged that the winner had made false statements on social media about his personal conduct and character.

Resumen de la sentencia

The court considered the boundary between legitimate political criticism and false factual assertions. Statements that amount to accusations of specific misconduct, rather than political disagreement, may fall within the statutory prohibition.

Citas clave

"The distinction is between statements of fact about a candidate's character or conduct, which may be actionable, and political criticism or opinion, which is protected."

Steyn J

Tratamiento posterior

Followed

Extends traditional election law to the social media context.

Related Content