Aviso legal: Esto no constituye asesoramiento jurídico. La legislación y la jurisprudencia cambian. Consulte siempre con un abogado cualificado para su situación específica.

Todos los casos
Employment Law
House of Lords
1988

Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd

[1988] AC 344

Ratio Decidendi

An employer cannot argue that a failure to follow a fair procedure made no difference to the outcome. Procedural fairness is an essential element of a fair dismissal. However, if the tribunal finds that dismissal would have occurred anyway, compensation may be reduced accordingly (the 'Polkey reduction').

Hechos

Mr Polkey was made redundant without any prior warning or consultation. The employer argued that consultation would have made no difference to the outcome.

Resumen de la sentencia

The House of Lords held the dismissal was unfair due to lack of consultation. The 'no difference' argument could not make an unfair dismissal fair, but could be relevant to the amount of compensation.

Citas clave

"An employer having prima facie grounds to dismiss will in the great majority of cases not act reasonably in treating the reason as a sufficient reason for dismissal unless and until he has taken the steps, conveniently classified in most of the authorities as 'procedural', which are necessary in the circumstances."

Lord Bridge

Tratamiento posterior

Foundational

The Polkey principle and Polkey reduction remain central to unfair dismissal law.

Related Content