Aviso legal: Esto no constituye asesoramiento jurídico. La legislación y la jurisprudencia cambian. Consulte siempre con un abogado cualificado para su situación específica.

Todos los casos
Prison & Parole
Supreme Court
2013

R (Osborn) v Parole Board

[2013] UKSC 61

Ratio Decidendi

Common law fairness requires the Parole Board to hold an oral hearing whenever fairness to the prisoner requires one. The Board must not adopt an unduly restrictive approach to directing oral hearings.

Hechos

Three prisoners challenged Parole Board decisions made on paper without oral hearings. They argued that fairness required an oral hearing before their cases could be properly determined.

Resumen de la sentencia

The Supreme Court held that the Parole Board must hold oral hearings whenever fairness requires them. Important factual issues that cannot be resolved on the papers, or issues of credibility, will normally require an oral hearing.

Citas clave

"The common law duty of procedural fairness does not stand still. It requires the Board to hold oral hearings whenever fairness to the prisoner requires one."

Lord Reed

Tratamiento posterior

Leading Authority

Led to significant increase in Parole Board oral hearings.