Aviso legal: Esto no constituye asesoramiento jurídico. La legislación y la jurisprudencia cambian. Consulte siempre con un abogado cualificado para su situación específica.

Todos los casos
Counter-Terrorism Law
Supreme Court
2013

R v Gul

[2013] UKSC 64

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of terrorism in s.1 Terrorism Act 2000 is broad and includes action taken against the military forces of a state, even where the state is oppressive. The breadth of the definition is a matter for Parliament.

Hechos

Gul uploaded videos glorifying attacks on coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was convicted of dissemination of terrorist publications under s.2 Terrorism Act 2006.

Resumen de la sentencia

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, holding that the s.1 definition of terrorism is deliberately broad and includes armed attacks on military forces where the other conditions of the definition are met.

Citas clave

"The definition in section 1 is very broad and, on its natural meaning, it includes military attacks by non-state armed groups."

Lord Neuberger

Tratamiento posterior

Applied

Applied in subsequent cases on the scope of the terrorism definition.