免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Contract Law
House of Lords
1915

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd

[1915] AC 847

判决理由

Only a party to a contract can sue on it (privity of contract). A person who is not a party to a contract cannot enforce a promise made for their benefit, even if they are the intended beneficiary.

事实

Dunlop sold tyres to Dew & Co (a dealer) on terms that Dew would not sell below list price and would obtain a similar undertaking from retailers. Dew sold to Selfridge, who agreed not to sell below list price. Selfridge sold below list price and Dunlop sued.

判决摘要

The House of Lords held that Dunlop could not enforce the agreement between Dew and Selfridge. Dunlop was not a party to that contract and had provided no consideration to Selfridge. The doctrine of privity prevented the claim.

关键引述

"In the law of England certain principles are fundamental. One is that only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it."

Viscount Haldane LC

后续处理

Good law (modified by statute)

The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 now allows third parties to enforce contractual terms in certain circumstances, modifying the strict privity rule.

Related Content