免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Cyber & Digital Law
Court of Appeal
2015

Google Inc v Vidal-Hall

[2015] EWCA Civ 311

判决理由

Compensation for distress caused by data protection breaches can be claimed without proof of pecuniary loss. The DPA 1998 must be interpreted consistently with the EU Data Protection Directive.

事实

Google used tracking cookies to collect browsing data from Safari users without their consent. The claimants sued for misuse of private information and breach of the Data Protection Act 1998.

判决摘要

The Court of Appeal held that compensation for distress under s.13 DPA 1998 did not require proof of financial loss. This aligned domestic law with the EU Directive.

关键引述

"Compensation for distress is not conditional upon proof of pecuniary loss."

Lord Dyson MR

后续处理

Applied

Applied in subsequent data protection claims including under UK GDPR.